Which of the following is a common outcome of both hollow sprints and acceleration sprints?

The common outcome of both hollow sprints and acceleration sprints is indeed the effects of repetitive exercise leading to potential fatigue. Both types of sprinting involve bursts of high-intensity effort followed by recovery periods, which can lead to the accumulation of fatigue over time, especially when performed in multiple repetitions or sessions.

In hollow sprints, there is an emphasis on alternating between sprints and rest, allowing for maximal speed on each sprint. Conversely, acceleration sprints focus on the gradual increase in speed over a set distance. Both require significant energy and can lead to fatigue as the body works hard to recover and perform immediately afterward.

Fatigue is not limited to muscular fatigue alone but also includes central nervous system fatigue and overall physical exhaustion, all of which can affect performance if not managed properly. Thus, the commonality in fatigue effects between these two forms of sprint training makes this outcome particularly relevant.

In contrast, the other options do not accurately reflect a common outcome of these sprinting techniques. Improved muscle endurance without fatigue would suggest that the athlete can perform at a high level indefinitely, which is unlikely with sprint training due to its demanding nature. Increased risk of injury typically arises from poor technique or overtraining rather than being an expected outcome for all participants, and